Does added sugar ruin weight loss?

Read the paper in its original format here:

BMNF_ Does eliminating added sugars change body composition independent of caloric intake_.

Download • 152KB

Does eliminating added sugars change body composition independent of caloric intake? Exploring the similarities between a lack of research and misinterpreted research.

Introduction

Added sugar intake may be a major focus in nutrition and public health, but a lack of clear understanding from consumers guided by diet culture and nutritional backlash puts sugar in a predicament. There are common claims that eliminating sugar leads to fat loss or metabolic improvements, but actual research regarding its relevance to body composition maintains otherwise. However, this research is not widely disclosed.

Although added sugar on its own is not distinctly underresearch, its findings are often misrepresented and distorted. Misinterpreting research is considered as harmful as, and in some cases, worse than a total lack of research. Lack of research exists in many scientific fields, but when it comes to sugar, it falls prey to incorrect application of data.

Evidence largely shows body composition changes from sugar intake are mediated by the effects of energy balance, such as from a caloric deficit, as opposed to the mechanistic effects of added sugar. Major controlled trials and meta-analyses do not support the idea that sugar intake causes fat gain. There is a discrepancy between public perception and research findings, with an overemphasis on sugar’s molecular properties rather than caloric context. This highlights the conflation of causal evidence and associative data.

This paper aims to evaluate the extent to which eliminating added sugars affects body composition independently of energy intake, with particular attention to findings from isocaloric intervention trials and their implications for nutrition and sport practice.

Background & Current Evidence

Added sugars include sugars added during a food’s processing (sucrose or dextrose), foods packaged as sweeteners (table sugar, syrups, and honey), and sugars from concentrated fruit or vegetable juices. They do not include sugars that occur naturally in foods such as fruits, vegetables, or milk. The common source of added sugars for most consumers come from sweetened beverages, baked goods, desserts, and candies.

Despite common claims, evidence shows no independent effect of added sugars on body weight or adipose tissue when caloric intake is controlled. Chiavaroli et al. (2023) conducted a large meta-analysis of fructose containing sugars and found no effect on body weight when energy from sugars was substituted and matched by other nutrients. This means, any calories coming from added sugar were directly exchanged with other macronutrients to match the total energy intake for the participants. Any increases or decreases in both body weight and adiposity could be attributed to either a surplus or deficit of calories.

Te Morenga et al. (2013) agrees with the aforementioned statement and concludes that changes in body weight from altering sugar intake are mediated via changes in energy intake, not unique metabolic properties of sugar. Isoenergetic exchange of dietary sugars with other carbohydrates showed no change in body weight. This is especially true for those on ad libitum diets, or eating freely without set calories or portion limits.

Mechanisms of Action: Energy Intake vs Sugar-Specific Effects

Added sugar is continually under physiological debate. Claims that consuming sugar will hinder any and all chances of weight loss even in a caloric deficit plague the internet. Prinz et al. (2019) shows that free sugars, another term for both chemical and natural added sugars, do not favor body weight gain independently. A study by Pfeiffer et al. (2018) attempted to hold sucrose, glucose, fructose, and isomaltulose accountable for metabolic damage based on its role in increasing glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptides (GIP), which means increasing appetite, body weight, and the risk for insulin resistance. However, this animal study was not transferable to the human diet, as these sugar molecules are rarely eaten in isolation. In ad libitum conditions, no significant increases in GIP secretion were found. These findings disagree with the hypothesis that sucrose, because of its molecular structure, has a detrimental effect in regard to the release of GIP, body weight gain, and insulin resistance. Data from human studies shows that it is the excess amount of calories, also consumed in the form of dietary sugars, that promotes obesity.

Excess calories lead to weight gain when energy intake exceeds metabolic and physical expenditure, forcing the body to store surplus energy. This excess is primarily stored as triglycerides in adipose tissue, expanding and increasing the number of fat cells. Chronic positive energy balances cause fat accumulation or obesity, not the intake of sugar molecules.

Key Hypotheses in the Field

There are two core hypotheses that emerge. The first hypothesis poses that eliminating added sugars improves body composition only when it reduces total caloric intake. This rationale is established by weight loss fundamentally following the laws of thermodynamics, specifically the First Law, or conservation of energy. Weight loss only occurs when calories are consistently expended more than they are consumed, forcing the body to rely on its own tissue for fuel. This law exists regardless of the caloric source.

The second hypothesis states that sugar reduction, on its own, provides no additional weight loss benefit in isocaloric diet changes. This challenges the claim that sugar independently possesses any unique metabolic properties that promote fat gain.

Research by Raghavan et al. (2023) supports these key ideas, and further expands the notion by including data on those who replaced added sugar with natural sugar substitutes like zero-calorie stevia. While the participants found reduction in waist circumference and weight, these were due to the lowered caloric intake.

Research Gaps and Future Research

Current research has shown that added sugar does not affect weight loss on its own. However, there are reasons that may aid in skepticism. These include short study durations, reporting of poor dietary adherence, an overreliance on self reported intake, the degree of ecological validity, and inconsistent definitions of “added” vs “free” sugars. These limitations can weaken the validity of our hypotheses by introducing uncertainty and bias in a way that hinders accurate conclusions. Research gaps can compromise a study's accuracy and generalizability, leading to misrepresentation.

Additionally, this research must expand beyond the original question. Although added sugar is proposed to have no direct effect on weight loss in an isocaloric setting, answers regarding overall health are still up in the air. As it pertains to physical attributes like gut and brain health, research is still evolving. Independent of weight, the current literature is examining the link between chronic intake of added sugars and systemic inflammation and risk of cognitive decline.

Non‑nutritive sweeteners (NNS) such as sucralose and saccharin can disrupt microbiota in animals, but human data shows mixed signals, with some trials finding inflammatory shifts and others showing no major effect. These inconsistent effects on gut microbiota are seen in the systematic review by Conz et al. (2023).

Additionally, specific macronutrient intake and its effect on cognitive function and the brain is explored by Muth et al. (2021), which found that higher added sugar intake may correlate with poorer global cognition and memory, while complex carbohydrates and fiber relate to healthier brain aging.

These studies highlight a need in future research to move past focusing on the effects of added sugar on weight loss, and start looking at how they affect the body physically, if at all, in moderation, not excess.

Conclusion and Implications for Clinical Practice and Health

Holistically looking at the data, added sugar is prevalent in our modern day foods, but its effects on health are to be kept in mind.

For athletes or those who participate in high levels of physical activity, strategically timed sugar intake can enhance fueling and recovery, as performance is limited by muscle and liver glycogen. Added sugars use different pathways than natural sugars, and can increase the total carbohydrate absorption and oxidation, leading to increased endurance performance. Additionally, elite endurance athletes can tolerate high intakes of simple sugars with no evidence of harm, as high energy output and exercise can protect against any proposed harmful effects.

In clinical practice, advise limiting added sugars for those handling diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or obesity. Understand the differences between added sugar intake and excessive added sugar intake and how their meanings produce different health outcomes. Recommendations include limiting intake to no more than 10% of daily calories. This point of view eliminates unnecessary diet alteration and holds current research accountable while also allowing room for future data to emerge. It is important to frame sugar reduction as a calorie management tool as opposed to a strategy that uniquely alters metabolism or promotes fat loss independent of energy balance.

References

Chiavaroli, L., Cheung, A., Ayoub-Charette, S., Ahmed, A., Lee, D., Fei Au-Yeung, Qi, X.,

Back, S., McGlynn, N., Ha, V., Lai, E., Khan, T. A., Sonia Blanco Mejia, Andreea Zurbau, Choo, V. L., Russell, Thomas MS. Wolever, Leiter, L. A., Cyril WC. Kendall, & David JA. Jenkins. (2023). Important food sources of fructose-containing sugars and adiposity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 117(4), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.01.023

Conz, A., Salmona, M., & Diomede, L. (2023). Effect of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on the Gut

Microbiota. Nutrients, 15(8), 1869. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15081869

Gonzalez, J. T., & Betts, J. A. (2019). Dietary sugars, exercise and hepatic carbohydrate

metabolism. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 78(2), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665118002604

Muth, A.-K., & Park, S. Q. (2021). The impact of dietary macronutrient intake on cognitive function and the brain. Clinical Nutrition, 40(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.04.043

Pfeiffer, A. F. H., & Keyhani-Nejad, F. (2018). High Glycemic Index Metabolic Damage – a

Pivotal Role of GIP and GLP-1. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 29(5), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2018.03.003

Prinz, P. (2019). The role of dietary sugars in health: molecular composition or just calories?

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73(9), 1216–1223.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-019-0407-z

Raghavan, G., Bapna, A., Mehta, A., Shah, A., & Vyas, T. (2023). Effect of Sugar Replacement

with Stevia-Based Tabletop Sweetener on Weight and Cardiometabolic Health among Indian Adults. Nutrients, 15(7), 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071744

Te Morenga, L., Mallard, S., & Mann, J. (2013). Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic

review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ, 346(jan15 3), e7492–e7492. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7492